Author
Dr. Michal Jozwiak, DDS
Vice–president of Polish Endodontic Society
Ilawa, Poland
1. Sex: male
2. Age: 52
3. Medical status: healthy
4. Dental history:
- May 2005: Implant placement on #36 and #37
- October 2005: #36 removal
- November 2005: Replacement of a new implant at 6 weeks
- December 2005: After implant removal at 3 months due to the failure, it was decided to fabricate bridge on natural tooth 35 and implant 37.
6. Chief complaint: Discomfort at implant 37 area
2. Age: 52
3. Medical status: healthy
4. Dental history:
- May 2005: Implant placement on #36 and #37
- October 2005: #36 removal
- November 2005: Replacement of a new implant at 6 weeks
- December 2005: After implant removal at 3 months due to the failure, it was decided to fabricate bridge on natural tooth 35 and implant 37.
6. Chief complaint: Discomfort at implant 37 area
Due to total lack of osseointegration, the bridge was cut off on #35 crown and the implant was removed.
Two implants (Ø4.0X7.3mm on #36 & Ø5.0X5.0 mm on #37) were immediately replaced on the same day and higher than 40Ncm of sufficient stability was able to be achieved.
Postoperative photograph of immediately placement implants.
7 days follow-up
Combined composite crowns for a long-term provisionalization was fabricated.
6 weeks
Occlusal view
3315 Total Views 2 Views Today
![](mailto:?subject=Immediate implant placement after removal of a failed implant&body=
<a href="http://gaoforum.com/members/michal-jozwiak/" target="_blank"><img class="vc_box_outline_circle vc_box_border_grey " src="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/jozwiak-80x80.jpg" width="80" height="80" alt="jozwiak" /></a>
<br/>Author<br/> Dr. Michal Jozwiak, DDS<br/><br/>Vice–president of Polish Endodontic Society
<br/>Ilawa, Poland<br/><br/><br/><br/>
<a href="#acc-5-6-d" data-parent="#accordion-5" data-toggle="collapse" class="accordion-toggle">Preoperative observation
</a>
<a class="prettyphoto" href="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement01.jpg" rel="prettyPhoto[rel-1535571935]">+<img width="960" height="720" src="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement01.jpg" class="attachment-full" alt="40Placement01" /></a><a class="prettyphoto" href="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement02.jpg" rel="prettyPhoto[rel-1535571935]">+<img width="960" height="720" src="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement02.jpg" class="attachment-full" alt="40Placement02" /></a>
<a href="#acc-7-8-d" data-parent="#accordion-7" data-toggle="collapse" class="accordion-toggle">Patient information
</a>
1. Sex: male<br/>
2. Age: 52<br/>
3. Medical status: healthy<br/>
4. Dental history: <br/>
- May 2005: Implant placement on #36 and #37<br/>
- October 2005: #36 removal<br/>
- November 2005: Replacement of a new implant at 6 weeks<br/>
- December 2005: After implant removal at 3 months due to the failure, it was decided to fabricate bridge on natural tooth 35 and implant 37.<br/>
6. Chief complaint: Discomfort at implant 37 area
<a href="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement03.jpg"><img width="960" height="720" src="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement03.jpg" class=" vc_box_border_grey attachment-full" alt="40Placement03" /></a>
Due to total lack of osseointegration, the bridge was cut off on #35 crown and the implant was removed.
<br/><br/>
<a href="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement04.jpg"><img width="960" height="720" src="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement04.jpg" class=" vc_box_border_grey attachment-full" alt="40Placement04" /></a>
Two implants (Ø4.0X7.3mm on #36 & Ø5.0X5.0 mm on #37) were immediately replaced on the same day and higher than 40Ncm of sufficient stability was able to be achieved.
<br/><br/>
<a href="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement05.jpg"><img width="960" height="720" src="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement05.jpg" class=" vc_box_border_grey attachment-full" alt="40Placement05" /></a>
Postoperative photograph of immediately placement implants.<br/><br/>
<a href="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement06.jpg"><img width="960" height="720" src="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement06.jpg" class=" vc_box_border_grey attachment-full" alt="40Placement06" /></a>
7 days follow-up<br/><br/>
<a href="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement07.jpg"><img width="960" height="720" src="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement07.jpg" class=" vc_box_border_grey attachment-full" alt="40Placement07" /></a>
Combined composite crowns for a long-term provisionalization was fabricated.
<br/><br/>
<a href="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement08.jpg"><img width="960" height="720" src="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement08.jpg" class=" vc_box_border_grey attachment-full" alt="40Placement08" /></a>
6 weeks<br/><br/>
<a href="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement09.jpg"><img width="960" height="720" src="http://gaoforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/40Placement09.jpg" class=" vc_box_border_grey attachment-full" alt="40Placement09" /></a>
Occlusal view
<br/><br/>
Due to total lack of osseointegration, the bridge was cut off on #35 crown and #37 implant was removed... http://gaoforum.com/immediate-implant-placement-after-removal-of-a-failed-implant/){kind=link}